The Biggest Villain in the College Application Drama
By Jay Mathews
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 17, 2002
One lovely morning last spring, sitting in the garden of the admissions office at Occidental College in Eagle Rock, Calif., I heard something disturbing about college applications in the computer age.
Admissions counselor Whitney Jenkins, a slender young woman with short hair and narrow glasses, was conducting an information session for visiting students and parents. She had been so thorough that her audience had run out of questions. "Maybe you would like to hear some of the things that drive us wild when we read applications," she said. We listeners perked up.
"What drives me crazy," she said, "is when we ask you to follow directions in filling out the application and you don't do so."
What could she mean? She went on to explain, and I have saved her words until now, the beginning of application writing season. My wife went over my daughter's checklist Sunday, to see from which colleges we still had no application forms. That is the easy part. I have heard enough about the actually writing of the application--and I am not talking about just the essays--to make me wonder if this is not a good time to visit my 85-year-old mother for a few weeks and let Katie and Linda handle this on their own.
I have a chapter about this in my book, Harvard Schmarvard, coming out in late February. I would not ordinarily pause for a shameless plug, but readers of this column have provided a rich supply of stories for the book, as well as quashing my more inane ideas and telling me which subjects work best.
According to Jenkins of Occidental, the slimiest villain in the application drama is the resume, a once exclusively professional device that has become so common among teenagers that it is beginning to corrupt college applications. "The worst is in reporting extra-curricular activities," she said. "If you want to provide more information, that is fine. But some will not fill out the actual boxes in our application and instead send us a resume. If we have to spend 10 minutes translating your resume into the categories on our form, that is 10 minutes less quality time to consider the merits of your application."
She moved on to spelling and grammar, confirming what several admissions officers have told me. Mistakes are very common, even in the age of spell check and parents eager to proofread.
A spelling error is a small thing. Some grammatical errors, in this inexact age, are often overlooked. But if a mistake stops an admissions office application reader for even a second, it creates an impression that is hard to erase. The same goes for decorative fonts and eye-catching topography. One admissions officer expressed dismay at an essay that had been written in spiral, forcing her to rotate the page in order to read the words that swirled in steadily tightening circles, like you know what going down the toilet. One of the counselors at my daughter's school said some student handwriting is so bad that she enlisted one sure-handed student to fill out portions of classmates' applications best done by hand. The counselor makes each offending applicant pay the copiest $5, as a reminder that they should have practiced their penmanship more in the third grade.
It is also a mistake to fill the extra-curricular activity spaces with every club, hobby and bake sale on which you have ever spent an afternoon. Admissions officials recommend against accumulating these small credits, walk-on parts in the drama of adolescent life, if they keep you from focusing on three or four key activities. If two of those activities are especially demanding, such as running your own business, coaching a Little League team or writing and directing your own play--then that is really all you need. The deeper you go, the more time you spend, the more passion you show for at least one of your activities, the better off you are.
Two good activities are often sufficient, for admissions committees have gotten into the habit of defining applicants with two descriptive terms that summarize their greatest strengths. One applicant is called the poet quarterback. Another is the carpenter debater. A third is the dress-designing science fair winner. If you have two activities strong enough to label yourself in that way, you are in good shape.
But you have to tell the truth. There is a temptation, as you review your life outside the classroom, to exaggerate, just a little bit.
That's lying. Don't lie. It won't work.
Resume padding is part of American culture, but it wears down your self-respect, a precious quality. And it will look false no matter how cleverly you package it. You may think you have a free pass to inflate your accomplishments because the admissions officer reading your file will not have the time or the inclination to check every detail. But that is because you don't understand how the process works.
If you are artificially enhancing your list of activities, you are probably doing so because you are applying to a very selective school and think you need every possible advantage. Unhappily for you, those are the colleges with the best admissions officers. The one reading your file may not know you, but she will probably know at least one counselor at your school, and be quick to pick up the phone and check entries that don't make sense. This is doubly true if you have a good chance of getting in, for you will likely be in competition with a high school classmate for that spot. In those circumstances very careful comparisons will be made.
The admissions officer will call the counselor to discuss the leading applicants from your school. Which has been the most conscientious in his school duties? Which has had the best ideas and the most admirable record for working with others?
See what is coming? The admissions officer will read back to the counselor the activities you have listed on your form. Something false will not only kill your chances of getting into that college, but may win you an unexpected appointment with your high school principal or your student honor committee.
I think the best approach to checking applications is to borrow an idea from our pioneer ancestors. They used to get together for a quilting bee so that everyone could help make the best bedspread. The same method worked for putting up houses and harvesting grain.
Wise applicants who wish to stop worrying once they have filed their applications would do well not only to follow all the instructions but circulate their applications among their friends before mailing them. Since everyone has to meet the same deadlines, why not an application bee?
Somebody offers her basement as a meeting place. Everyone chips in for pizzas and sodas. Each partygoer brings draft copies of his or her applications, to be passed around for everyone else to read. No one dares pad a resume and then show to friends. Granted, this can be embarrassing, but consider the alternative: Would you really rather leave the job to your parents? Spelling and grammatical errors earn red check marks, and maybe a few jokes.
And since the purpose of an application is to convince the college that you would be a positive presence on campus, someone they would like to have around, no one can do a better job at identifying and crossing out unattractive bits of ego or immaturity than the people who know you best.
Then everyone can relax, rent any of a wide assortment of campus comedies at the video store ("P.C.U." is my favorite), enjoy the evening and, when you get home, sleep very soundly.